Skip to main content

Struck by Vehicle on Construction Sites in Staten Island, NY
Labor Law 240 Claims

Injured in a struck by vehicle on construction sites on a Staten Island construction site? New York's Labor Law protects injured construction workers. Free consultation — no fee unless we win.

Struck by Vehicle on Construction Sites in Staten Island: What Workers Need to Know

Staten Island runs a high-volume construction market — 18,000 active permits and roughly 280 major sites operating at any given time. State data shows about 980 construction injury reports filed annually in Staten Island. New York's Labor Law sets the rules for these cases — §240(1) for elevation and gravity-related hazards, §241(6) for Industrial Code violations, and §200 for general site-safety negligence. When a Staten Island construction worker is hurt in a struck by vehicle on construction sites, liability can fall on the property owner and general contractor depending on how the injury happened — the analysis below breaks down exactly how the law applies to a struck by vehicle on construction sites.

18,000Active Permits
980Annual Injury Reports
18Fatalities (5 Year)
$1M - $20M+Case Value Range

How New York Labor Law Applies to a Struck by Vehicle on Construction Sites in Staten Island

Struck at ground level with no elevation differential, so Labor Law §240(1) generally does NOT apply — and the worker's own conduct is fully in play. An honest page says so.

Because the worker is struck at grade with no height element, Labor Law §240(1) generally does not apply. Under Ross and Runner, §240 requires a physically significant elevation differential, so a struck-by-at-grade event is outside it — the right move is to drop §240 rather than over-plead it (a narrow exception applies only if the facts inject a real height, such as being knocked into an excavation).

The spine of the case is §241(6), through the Industrial Code's vehicle and traffic-control provisions, which is non-delegable and attaches without owner supervision (Rizzuto). §200 runs on two tracks — the owner or general contractor's actual control of the means and methods, and, often the most culpable, the equipment operator's direct negligence with the operator's employer vicariously liable. A public-road strike adds ordinary vehicle-and-traffic negligence and possible municipal or state-DOT exposure.

How Struck by Vehicle on Construction Sites Happen

Understanding the mechanics of a struck by vehicle on construction sites matters in a Labor Law 240 case — it determines which specific duty the owner or contractor breached.

Backing vehicle in blind zone

Dump trucks, concrete mixers, and excavators have large blind zones directly behind the cab. A worker who steps into the path of a reversing vehicle while the operator is looking at a spotter or guide is invisible to the operator. The vehicle's mass — 30,000 to 80,000 pounds for a loaded dump truck — means that even at low speeds (2-3 mph), contact with a pedestrian produces crush injuries to the lower extremities, pelvis, and abdomen that are frequently fatal.

Swing-radius contact from rotating equipment

The counterweight and cab of a hydraulic excavator swing through a full 360-degree arc during normal operation. Workers who enter the swing radius — often to communicate with the operator or retrieve materials — are struck by the counterweight without warning. The counterweight moves at a fixed angular velocity that translates to 8-12 mph at the tip. Contact at that speed delivers forces equivalent to a motor vehicle accident.

Public vehicle intrusion into work zone

NYC construction on or adjacent to public roadways creates interface zones where public vehicles can enter the site. When jersey barriers, cones, or flaggers are insufficient or absent, a distracted or impaired driver can strike workers who have no opportunity to react. Construction workers on roadway sites are killed by vehicle intrusion at a rate 3 times higher than workers in fully enclosed sites.

Where Staten Island Cases Are Filed

Staten Island County Supreme Court

18 Richmond Terrace, Staten Island, NY 10301

13th Judicial District · undefined Department

Major Construction Sites in Staten Island

Struck by Vehicle on Construction Sites risks are concentrated wherever large projects operate. These are the highest-activity sites in Staten Island right now:

Empire Outlets

Retail/Mixed-use

$350 million

Complete

St. George Waterfront

Mixed-use development

$500+ million

Phases ongoing

NY Wheel (cancelled)

Entertainment

N/A

Cancelled - site redevelopment

Where Struck by Vehicle on Construction Sites Happen Across Staten Island

Struck by Vehicle on Construction Sites risk follows the work, and in Staten Island construction concentrates in these areas:

St. George/Stapleton

Waterfront development, downtown revitalization, ferry terminal

North Shore

Residential development, industrial areas

Mid-Island

Commercial development, retail centers

South Shore

Residential construction, coastal resiliency

East Shore

Resiliency projects, residential infill

West Shore

New residential development, retail

Trauma Centers Serving Staten Island

These accredited trauma centers receive the most serious construction injuries from Staten Island. Medical records from these facilities become key evidence in your claim.

LI

Staten Island University Hospital — North

475 Seaview Avenue, Staten Island, NY 10305

The only Level I trauma center on Staten Island. Receives nearly every serious construction injury on the island; transfers to Manhattan or Brooklyn add 30-60 minutes by ambulance.

LII

Richmond University Medical Center

355 Bard Avenue, Staten Island, NY 10310

Level II trauma center serving the North Shore. Coordinates with SIUH for the most severe cases.

Union Locals in Staten Island

The primary unions covering Staten Island construction workers are: LIUNA Local 66, IBEW Local 3, Ironworkers Local 361, Carpenters Local 157. Full list includes 12 active locals on Staten Island job sites.

Union membership does not limit your Labor Law rights. Your union cannot negotiate away your right to sue the property owner and general contractor for a construction-site injury. Workers' compensation and a personal injury lawsuit are separate claims — you are entitled to both.

OSHA Standards That Apply to Struck by Vehicle on Construction Sites

29 CFR 1926.501Fall Protection - General Requirements

6,763 citations in FY2024 nationwide. OSHA citations for this standard on a Staten Island job site are admissible in a Labor Law 241(6) claim.

29 CFR 1910.1200Hazard Communication

3,111 citations in FY2024 nationwide. OSHA citations for this standard on a Staten Island job site are admissible in a Labor Law 241(6) claim.

New York's Industrial Code Rule 23 (12 NYCRR Part 23) adds state-specific requirements on top of OSHA. A violation of Rule 23 that proximately caused your injury can establish liability under Labor Law 241(6), independent of Labor Law 240.

Staten Island Construction History

Verrazzano-Narrows Bridge (1959-1964) — At completion the longest suspension bridge in the world, connecting Staten Island to Brooklyn. Three ironworkers died in falls during construction. The deaths drove the federal requirement for safety nets on bridges over 25 feet — a rule that the Hard Hat Riders local 40 ironworkers had pushed for unsuccessfully for decades. Modern Labor Law 240 fall-protection cases still cite the Verrazzano construction record.

OSHA Standards That Govern Struck by Vehicle on Construction Sites

29 CFR 1926.601(b)(4)

On-site vehicles with an obstructed rear view need a reverse-signal alarm audible above the noise, or may back up only when a spotter signals it is safe.

29 CFR 1926.602(a)(9)

The same backup-alarm or spotter rule for earthmoving and compacting equipment.

29 CFR 1926.201(a)

Flaggers and traffic control conform to the MUTCD high-visibility and signaling specifications.

NY Industrial Code Subpart 23-9 supplies the §241(6) predicates — most importantly the motor-truck rule requiring a spotter positioned to see both the driver and the space behind before backing or dumping where workers are present (stricter than OSHA), and the excavating-machine rule keeping workers out of the swing range of the bucket. The public-vehicular-traffic provision (23-1.29) governs roadway work zones. After Mann v. Mezuyon (2026), do not lead on the excavation-equipment "struck or endangered" provision.

How a Struck by Vehicle on Construction Sites Happens — and the Injuries It Causes

A backover where no alarm sounded or no spotter was posted, a run-over by tracked or wheeled equipment, a caught-between or pinned crush against a fixed object, a swing or counterweight strike, or a roadway intrusion by passing traffic. These are struck-by and caught-in/between events — two of OSHA's "Fatal Four."

Blunt-force, compression, and run-over trauma at grade, not fall physics: crush injuries and crush syndrome, traumatic amputation, degloving, pelvic-ring and lower-extremity fractures, internal organ rupture, and traumatic brain injury — frequently fatal.

What Drives the Value of a Staten Island Struck by Vehicle on Construction Sites Case

Typical case value: $1M - $20M+. Catastrophic or fatal injury sets the magnitude, and clean liability artifacts — a missing backup alarm, no spotter, no traffic plan — map to both an OSHA standard and a specific Industrial Code predicate, which strengthens the §241(6) claim.

What the defense will argue: Because there is no §240 shield, comparative negligence is fully available: the defense argues the worker walked into the path, stood in a known blind spot, ignored a working alarm or spotter, or was not wearing high-visibility gear, and under New York's pure comparative-negligence rule the award is reduced — not barred — by the worker's share of fault. Expect a challenge to the specificity of the Industrial Code predicate.

Case-value ranges describe general outcomes in New York construction cases — not a prediction or guarantee. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

The New York Cases That Control a Struck by Vehicle on Construction Sites Claim

Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric, 81 NY2d 494 (1993)

§240(1) is limited to elevation-related hazards — a struck-by-at-grade event is outside it.

Rizzuto v. L.A. Wenger Contracting, 91 NY2d 343 (1998)

§241(6) is non-delegable and attaches without proof the owner supervised the work.

Frequently Asked Questions: Struck by Vehicle on Construction Sites in Staten Island

Hurt in a Struck by Vehicle on Construction Sites in Staten Island?

Tell us what happened. A licensed New York attorney will review your case — free, no obligation, no fee unless you win.

Get a Free Case Review

Tell us what happened. A licensed New York attorney will review your case and call you — no obligation.

Prefer to call? (914) 407-3717

Or call directly: (914) 407-3717

Struck by Vehicle on Construction Sites in Other Areas of New York

Other Construction Accidents in Staten Island

This page is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Case outcomes depend on the specific facts of your situation. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. NY Construction Advocate is the client intake service for Haddock Law, a New York law practice that represents injured construction workers directly and, when a case benefits from additional expertise, works with experienced co-counsel. Labor Law 240 cases are handled on a contingency basis.

Call NowFree Case Review