Contractor Liability
Turner Construction Accident Liability in New York
Turner is one of the largest general contractors in the United States. When workers are injured on Turner-managed sites in New York, Labor Law 240 and 241 impose direct liability on Turner — whether or not Turner employed the injured worker.
Free Case ReviewAbout Turner Construction
Turner Construction Company was founded in 1902 by Henry Chandler Turner, a Cornell engineering graduate who had helped develop a new method of reinforced concrete construction. Over the next century, the company grew into one of the dominant general contractors in the United States, with more than 10,000 employees and annual revenue consistently above $15 billion.
In New York City, Turner's portfolio is massive. The company served as general contractor for Hudson Yards — the largest private real estate development in United States history — including the 30 Hudson Yards office tower, 35 Hudson Yards, and the broader platform infrastructure. Turner has also managed construction on major Manhattan office towers, hospital expansions, university buildings, and public infrastructure projects. One World Trade Center involved multiple major contractors including Turner in various phases.
Turner's New York work typically involves high-rise construction, large commercial and institutional projects, and complex multi-trade jobsites with dozens of subcontractors operating simultaneously. Those project characteristics — multiple subs, heavy work at elevation, dense site activity — are exactly the conditions where New York's Labor Laws matter most.
How Labor Law 240 and 241 Apply to Turner Projects
As a general contractor, Turner takes on the non-delegable duty imposed by New York Labor Law §§ 240(1) and 241(6). Those statutes make GCs strictly liable for gravity-related injuries — falls from height, falling objects — and liable (subject to comparative fault) for violations of the NY Industrial Code.
"Non-delegable" is the key concept. Turner manages jobsites through a hierarchy of subcontractors — concrete subs, steel erectors, mechanical and electrical trades, facade workers. But Turner's legal duty to protect workers does not flow down through that chain. It stays with Turner. If a scaffold on a Turner site is improperly erected and a worker falls, Turner faces Section 240(1) liability regardless of which sub put the scaffold up.
On a Turner high-rise project, the relevant risk scenarios are predictable: workers on elevated platforms, open floor edges, materials being hoisted, steel being placed. Section 240(1) was written precisely for this environment. When a hoist line fails, when a safety net isn't rigged, when a worker on an upper floor has no fall protection — the statute puts Turner in the liability chain.
Section 241(6) catches additional scenarios that 240(1) doesn't: slippery walking surfaces (12 NYCRR 23-1.7(d)), tripping hazards from debris (23-1.7(e)(1)), inadequate lighting (23-1.30), unguarded openings (23-1.7(b)). On a complex Turner site with ongoing work across dozens of floors, Industrial Code violations are a recurring issue.
What Workers Injured at Turner Sites Can Recover
If you were injured on a Turner project in New York and your injury involved a fall from height, a falling object, or a specific Industrial Code violation, you may have claims directly against Turner under Labor Law 240 and/or 241. These claims are separate from workers' compensation and can be brought even if your comp claim is already pending.
Recoverable damages include:
- Past and future medical expenses — including all treatment, surgery, rehabilitation, and any lifetime care costs
- Lost wages and reduced earning capacity — especially significant for skilled tradespeople who can no longer perform their trade
- Pain and suffering — New York places no cap on these damages in personal injury cases
- Loss of consortium — your spouse's independent claim for loss of companionship
Turner and its insurers are experienced litigation adversaries. They have in-house risk management teams and retain major defense firms. That's a reason to have competent plaintiff's counsel — not a reason to walk away from a legitimate claim.
Documenting Your Claim
Documentation matters, and the window to collect it closes fast. If you were injured at a Turner site:
- Report the accident in writing — get a copy of the incident report. Do not let the site super take a verbal account and walk away.
- Photograph everything before leaving if you can — the scaffold, the ladder, the floor opening, the debris, whatever caused the injury. Conditions change fast on active construction sites.
- Get witness names and contact information — other tradespeople on that floor, anyone who saw what happened
- Seek medical attention immediately — go to the ER or urgent care the same day. A gap in medical treatment becomes an argument against you
- Write down what happened while it's fresh — a personal record of events in your own words, dated, before you speak to insurance adjusters
- Don't sign anything from Turner's insurance carrier, claims adjusters, or attorneys without your own lawyer reviewing it first
Turner's project records — safety inspection logs, subcontractor daily reports, toolbox talk records, OSHA 300 logs — are all potentially relevant and can be obtained through litigation discovery. An attorney can also issue litigation holds to prevent record destruction.
Common Questions
I'm an ironworker employed by a steel sub — can I sue Turner directly?
Yes. Labor Law 240(1) applies to contractors and owners regardless of whether they employed the worker. Turner's role as GC on the project is sufficient to bring it within the statute. Iron and steel erection work involves constant exposure to fall hazards and falling object risks — precisely what 240(1) was written to address.
Turner's safety team says I violated their safety rules — does that hurt my case?
Under Labor Law 240(1), comparative fault is not a defense. Even if Turner can point to a safety rule you technically violated, that doesn't eliminate their liability if the safety device was inadequate. The "sole proximate cause" defense requires Turner to show no safety violation contributed to the accident — a high bar that courts apply narrowly. A safety rule violation by the worker is almost never enough.
What if I got hurt on a Turner project that's publicly funded — like a hospital or transit project?
If a government entity owns the property (a public hospital, an MTA station, a public university), that entity is a potential defendant alongside Turner. Public entity defendants trigger the 90-day Notice of Claim requirement. Your injury claim against the contractor (Turner) likely still follows the standard 3-year personal injury statute of limitations, but you need an attorney to sort through the specific defendants and deadlines in your case.
What's the difference between a workers' comp claim and a Labor Law claim against Turner?
Workers' comp pays medical bills and about two-thirds of your average weekly wage, with no pain and suffering component. A Labor Law 240/241 claim against Turner is a civil lawsuit seeking full damages including pain and suffering and full wage replacement. You can collect both. Your comp carrier gets a lien on the third-party recovery, but net recoveries in serious cases are almost always far larger than comp benefits alone.