Skip to main content

Falling Objects

Workers struck by falling tools, materials, or debris are fully protected under Labor Law 240.

The short answer

Labor Law 240 protects workers not only from falling, but also from being struck by falling objects. This includes tools dropped from above, materials that fall during hoisting, debris from demolition, and any other object that falls due to gravity. Property owners must secure all materials and tools to prevent them from falling on workers below.

The Deadly Reality of Falling Objects

Falling objects are one of OSHA's 'Fatal Four'—the leading causes of death in construction. Every worker on every site is at risk.

146
Struck-by deaths (2023)

According to BLS, struck-by accidents caused 146 construction fatalities in 2023—13.6% of all construction deaths.

1,075
Total construction deaths

BLS reports 1,075 construction fatalities in 2023, the highest since 2011. Struck-by incidents are among the 'Fatal Four' causes.

#3
Cause of death ranking

Struck-by incidents are the third leading cause of construction death after falls and transportation incidents.

100%
Preventable

OSHA emphasizes that struck-by fatalities are preventable with proper overhead protection, toeboards, debris nets, and tool tethering.

What Is a Falling Object Accident?

A falling object accident occurs when a worker is struck by a tool, material, debris, or equipment that falls or is dropped from a height. Under Labor Law 240, these accidents don't require the injured worker to have been elevated—the law protects workers struck by objects that fall due to the failure of gravity-related safety devices.

Falling object accidents in construction take several forms:

Dropped tools and equipment are extremely common: - Hammers, wrenches, and hand tools - Power tools (drills, saws, grinders) - Measuring instruments and levels - Welding equipment - Small equipment and devices

Falling construction materials cause severe injuries: - Lumber, plywood, and wood beams - Steel beams and structural members - Bricks, blocks, and masonry - Roofing materials and bundles - Pipes, conduit, and ductwork - Drywall and sheetrock panels

Debris and waste falling from work areas: - Demolition debris - Cut-offs and scrap materials - Discarded packaging - Accumulated waste on scaffolds - Loose materials on floors and platforms

Equipment and machinery failures: - Crane load drops - Hoist failures - Rigging failures - Conveyor malfunctions - Material handling equipment failures

Structural and component failures: - Unsecured structural members falling - Facade and curtain wall elements - HVAC equipment and ductwork - Scaffolding components - Formwork and temporary structures

Each of these scenarios triggers Labor Law 240 protection because the law covers not just falls BY workers, but also injuries FROM falling objects.

How Labor Law 240 Protects Falling Object Victims

New York's Labor Law 240 protects workers injured by falling objects, not just workers who fall themselves. This aspect of the Scaffold Law is often overlooked but provides powerful protections.

The Absolute Duty for Falling Object Protection

Labor Law 240 specifically requires property owners and contractors to provide:

"Scaffolding, hoists, stays, ladders, slings, hangers, blocks, pulleys, braces, irons, ropes, and other devices which shall be so constructed, placed and operated as to give proper protection to a person so employed."

This language covers protection FROM falling objects. They must ensure:

  • Overhead protection (canopies, netting, barriers)
  • Toeboards on scaffolds and platforms
  • Secured materials and tools
  • Proper hoisting and rigging equipment
  • Debris nets and catch platforms
  • Barricades around overhead work areas
  • Hard hats and head protection

Strict Liability Standard for Falling Objects

The strict liability standard applies equally to falling object cases:

1. No negligence required. You don't need to prove anyone was careless. You only need to show: - A falling object struck you - Adequate safety devices weren't provided - You were injured as a result

2. The object doesn't need to be dropped. Objects that fall due to inadequate securing, collapse of support structures, or failure of rigging all trigger the law.

3. You don't need to be elevated. Workers on the ground injured by objects falling from above are fully protected.

What Must Be Proven in Falling Object Cases

To establish liability under Labor Law 240 for a falling object:

  • An object fell from a height
  • The falling was related to a gravity-related hazard
  • The object was being hoisted, secured, or should have been secured
  • Adequate safety devices would have prevented the injury
  • You were injured as a result

Who Can Be Held Liable?

Same as other Labor Law 240 cases:

  • Property owners – Building owners are strictly liable
  • General contractors – Primary contractors with oversight
  • Construction managers – Parties with supervisory control
  • Statutory agents – Those delegated safety responsibility

Common Causes of Falling Object Accidents

Most falling object accidents are entirely preventable with proper safety measures. Understanding the causes helps establish liability.

Inadequate Overhead Protection

The most fundamental failure:

  • No canopies or covered walkways below work areas
  • Missing debris nets or catch platforms
  • Inadequate barricades around drop zones
  • No netting on scaffolds
  • Failure to create exclusion zones

Scaffold and Platform Deficiencies

Platforms must contain materials and tools:

  • Missing or inadequate toeboards
  • Gaps in scaffold planking
  • No material containment on platforms
  • Overloaded platforms causing spills
  • Deteriorated or damaged platforms

Rigging and Hoisting Failures

Equipment for lifting materials can fail:

  • Overloaded slings or cables
  • Worn or damaged rigging equipment
  • Improper rigging techniques
  • Crane or hoist malfunctions
  • Unqualified operators
  • Lack of tag lines for load control

Material Storage and Handling

How materials are stored affects fall risk:

  • Materials stored too close to edges
  • Unstable stacking of materials
  • Improper securing of stored materials
  • Materials left on temporary platforms
  • Inadequate material handling procedures

Human Factors and Work Practices

Behavior contributes to falling objects:

  • Not using tool lanyards
  • Throwing materials instead of lowering
  • Careless material handling
  • Rushing to meet deadlines
  • Failure to maintain clean work areas
  • Inadequate communication between levels

Environmental Factors

Conditions can trigger falling objects:

  • Wind dislodging unsecured materials
  • Rain making surfaces slippery
  • Ice or frost affecting grip
  • Vibration from equipment
  • Seismic activity

Need help understanding your case?

Free, confidential consultation—no obligation.

Free Case Review

Injuries from Falling Objects

Falling object injuries can be catastrophic. Even small objects become deadly when falling from height, and larger objects can cause immediate death.

Traumatic Brain Injuries (TBI)

Head injuries are the most common severe injury: - Skull fractures - Concussions and contusions - Intracranial hemorrhage - Diffuse axonal injury - Coma and brain death

Even with hard hats, heavy objects can cause severe TBI. Hard hats are designed for limited impacts and don't protect against all falling objects.

Spinal Cord Injuries

Impact to the head, neck, or back can damage the spine: - Cervical vertebrae fractures - Spinal cord compression - Disc herniation and rupture - Paralysis (partial or complete) - Loss of bodily function

Crush Injuries

Large falling objects cause crushing injuries: - Multiple fractures - Compartment syndrome - Tissue necrosis - Amputation requirements - Internal organ damage

Eye and Face Injuries

Smaller objects often strike the face: - Eye penetration and blindness - Facial bone fractures - Dental injuries - Lacerations and scarring - Permanent disfigurement

Shoulder, Neck, and Back Injuries

Impact forces travel through the body: - Cervical fractures - Shoulder blade and clavicle fractures - Rotator cuff tears - Herniated discs - Chronic back injuries

Internal Injuries

Force transmission causes internal damage: - Organ lacerations and rupture - Internal bleeding - Rib fractures - Lung damage - Kidney and liver damage

Long-Term Consequences

Falling object injury victims often face: - Permanent cognitive impairment from TBI - Chronic pain syndromes - Multiple reconstructive surgeries - Permanent disability - PTSD and psychological trauma - Loss of independence - Financial devastation

What Compensation Can You Recover?

Under Labor Law 240, falling object victims can recover thorough compensation that far exceeds workers' compensation limits.

Medical Expenses

Full recovery of all medical costs: - Emergency and trauma care - Hospital stays and surgeries - Neurosurgery and specialized care - Rehabilitation services - Physical and cognitive therapy - Prescription medications - Prosthetics and assistive devices - Future medical expenses - In-home care and nursing

Lost Wages and Earning Capacity

Complete recovery of income losses: - Wages lost during recovery - Lost overtime and bonuses - Vocational rehabilitation - Reduced earning capacity - Total disability payments - Lost retirement contributions

Pain and Suffering

Full non-economic damages: - Physical pain and discomfort - Emotional distress - Cognitive impairment impact - Loss of enjoyment of life - Permanent scarring - Loss of independence - Loss of consortium

Wrongful Death

If a falling object causes death: - Funeral and burial expenses - Lost financial support - Loss of household services - Loss of guidance and companionship - Conscious pain and suffering before death - Punitive damages in egregious cases

Settlement and Verdict Examples

Labor Law 240 falling object cases have achieved significant results:

  • $9.3 million – Steel beam fell from crane, causing TBI and permanent disability
  • $6.8 million – Worker struck by falling scaffolding component, spinal injury
  • $5.2 million – Brick fell from facade work, causing severe head injury
  • $4.1 million – Lumber dropped from upper floor, causing multiple fractures
  • $2.9 million – Tool fell from scaffold, causing eye loss and facial injuries

These amounts reflect the severity of injuries and the strength of Labor Law 240's protections.

Settlement amounts vary based on injury severity, jurisdiction, and case facts. Figures reflect reported NY construction verdicts. Source: NY State court records. Your case may differ significantly.

Need help understanding your case?

Free, confidential consultation—no obligation.

Free Case Review

What to Do After a Falling Object Accident

The steps you take after being struck by a falling object are critical for your health and your legal case.

1. Get Immediate Medical Attention

Falling object injuries require emergency evaluation: - Head injuries can have delayed symptoms—always get checked - Don't refuse ambulance transport - Get full imaging (CT scans for head trauma) - Report all symptoms, even minor ones - Follow up with specialists as directed

2. Report the Accident

Create an official record: - Report to supervisor immediately - Ensure incident report is completed - Identify what fell and from where - Note safety equipment (or lack thereof) - Get copy of report if possible

3. Document Everything

Evidence preservation is critical: - Photograph the fallen object - Document where it fell from - Photo the impact location - Identify what safety measures were absent - Get witness names and contacts - Keep all medical records and bills - Save work documents and training records

4. Preserve the Object

The object itself is evidence: - Don't let it be disposed of - Note its location and condition - Take detailed photographs - Request it be preserved

5. Don't Give Recorded Statements

Protect your case: - Decline recorded statements without legal advice - Don't discuss fault with anyone - Don't sign releases - Stay off social media

6. Consult an Attorney Immediately

Time is critical in falling object cases: - Evidence can disappear quickly - Witnesses forget details - Reconstruction may be needed - Insurance companies move fast to minimize claims

How Falling Object Accidents Should Be Prevented

Understanding proper safety measures helps identify where the safety system failed in your case.

Overhead Protection Requirements

When workers are below elevated work: - Debris nets beneath scaffolds - Canopies over walkways and entrances - Catch platforms at appropriate intervals - Barricades and warning signs - Controlled access zones

Scaffold and Platform Protection

All elevated work platforms need: - Toeboards at least 4 inches high - Screens or mesh where needed - Material containment systems - Regular cleaning of debris - Load management

Tool and Equipment Securing

Preventing dropped tools requires: - Tool lanyards and tethers - Tool pouches and holsters - Designated tool storage areas - No throwing of tools - Proper hand-off procedures

Material Handling Procedures

Safe material management includes: - Proper rigging and hoisting - Tag lines for load control - Qualified crane operators - Regular equipment inspection - Material lowering rather than dropping - Secured storage on platforms

Communication and Coordination

Multi-level work requires: - Clear communication between levels - Warning systems for overhead work - Coordination of work sequences - Exclusion zones when necessary - Documented safety procedures

When these measures are absent or inadequate, property owners and contractors are liable under Labor Law 240.

Falling Object Accidents Across New York

Falling object accidents occur on construction sites throughout New York State, from Manhattan high-rises to residential renovations in upstate communities. Each area presents unique hazards.

New York City's High-Rise Dangers

The dense construction environment in NYC creates heightened falling object risks. In Manhattan, workers on supertall buildings work hundreds of feet above city streets. A dropped tool or unsecured material can fall dozens of stories before striking someone below. The Hudson Yards development, World Trade Center projects, and countless high-rise residential towers all present these dangers.

Brooklyn's construction boom—particularly in Downtown Brooklyn and the waterfront areas—has brought high-rise falling object hazards to the borough. The transformation of industrial sites into residential towers means workers face similar risks to Manhattan projects.

Queens faces unique challenges at LaGuardia Airport's massive reconstruction project, where falling objects could disrupt not only workers but active airport operations. The Long Island City high-rise corridor also presents concentrated falling object dangers.

Residential Construction Risks

Even on smaller projects, falling object dangers are real. Roofing work across Staten Island and The Bronx regularly produces falling object injuries. A bundle of shingles or a tool dropped from a two-story roof can cause severe injury or death.

Brownstone renovations throughout Brooklyn and Manhattan involve demolition debris, falling facade materials, and dropped tools in tight urban spaces where pedestrians and workers share cramped areas.

Upstate New York

Falling object hazards extend throughout the state:

  • Buffalo – Industrial construction and waterfront development projects
  • Rochester – Healthcare facility construction and commercial renovations
  • Syracuse – University campus projects and infrastructure work
  • Albany – Government buildings and state capitol construction

The Universal Protection of Labor Law 240

Regardless of project size or location within New York State, Labor Law 240 provides the same protection. A worker struck by a falling hammer on a Staten Island home renovation has the same legal rights as one injured by a falling beam at a Manhattan skyscraper. The law's strict liability standard applies universally.

Related Accident Types

Falling object injuries often occur alongside other construction hazards. Learn about related accidents:

Common Causes

Hard hats alone are not...

Hard hats alone are not sufficient protection

All materials must be secured...

All materials must be secured against falling

Toe boards required on scaffolds...

Toe boards required on scaffolds

Debris nets may be required...

Debris nets may be required on demolition sites

Common Safety Violations

Failure to secure tools and materials

No toe boards on scaffolds

Inadequate debris netting

No overhead protection for workers below

Improper material storage at heights

Failure to barricade areas below work

Frequently Asked Questions About Falling Objects

Get answers to the most common questions about falling objects claims and your rights under Labor Law 240.

How New York Labor Law Applies to a Falling-object accident

This is the page where Labor Law §240(1) is the EXCEPTION, not the rule — the Court of Appeals sharply limited which falling objects qualify.

Unlike scaffold and ladder falls, the §240(1) falling-object prong is narrow. To recover under §240(1), the object must have been either being hoisted or secured, or have required securing for the purposes of the work, AND have fallen because an enumerated safety device was absent or inadequate. The Court of Appeals drew the lines in three cases: Narducci (falling glass from the existing structure was not a load that required securing — no §240(1); a companion holding found a light fixture falling at the same level a de minimis differential), Outar (an unsecured dolly that required securing for the work and fell — §240(1) applied), and Fabrizi (a conduit held by a structural coupling, not a safety device — no §240(1)).

When any of those gates fails, the case drops to §241(6) — through the Industrial Code's overhead-hazard and hard-hat provisions — and to §200 negligence, where comparative fault revives. So falling-object cases live on §241(6) and §200 far more than scaffold or ladder cases do, and the entire fight is which side of the Narducci/Outar line the facts land on.

NY Industrial Code (12 NYCRR Part 23)

NY Industrial Code 23-1.7(a) ("Overhead hazards") requires overhead protection where a work area is normally exposed to falling material — and that "normally exposed" language is the defense's favorite limit. The hard-hat provision (23-1.8(c)) and safe-storage/stacking provisions support §241(6) where §240(1) does not reach.

Federal OSHA Standards That Govern Falling Objects

These are the verbatim federal standards enforceable on every New York construction site. An OSHA citation for a standard that proximately caused your injury supports a Labor Law \u00a7241(6) claim independent of Labor Law \u00a7240.

29 CFR 1926.501(c)

Protect workers from falling objects with hard hats plus toeboards, screens, guardrails, canopies, or by barricading the area below.

29 CFR 1926.451(h)

Falling-object protection on scaffolds — toeboards, screening, or barricading the area below.

29 CFR 1926.759(a)

In steel erection, tools and materials aloft and not in use must be secured against accidental displacement.

How a Falling Objects Happens \u2014 and the Injuries It Causes

The Mechanism

Gravity-driven kinetic energy: a small dense tool dropped from height or a heavy load released from a floor above. The impact point is typically the head, neck, shoulders, or upper back, because the worker is below and looking down. A dropped hand tool produces focal head trauma (the "secure your tools aloft" pattern); a hoisted load produces crush and multi-system trauma (the hoisting/storage pattern).

The Medical Reality

Skull fracture and traumatic brain injury, cervical-spine axial-loading injury, crush injuries from large loads, and shoulder and clavicle fractures. Hard hats reduce skull-fracture risk but do not stop a high-mass load or cervical axial loading — which is why the law's primary duty is to keep the object from falling, not merely to mitigate with PPE.

What Drives Case Value in a Falling Objects Claim

TBI and spinal-cord injury set the order of magnitude, but §240(1) applicability is itself the biggest value lever. Inside §240(1), comparative fault is off the table and value rises sharply; outside it, the entire comparative-negligence toolkit reopens and value drops. The fight is about coverage, not how badly the worker was hurt.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

What the Defense Will Argue

Every defense aims to keep the case out of §240(1) and into comparative-fault negligence: the object did not require securing (Narducci), it was not being hoisted, the elevation differential was de minimis (Capparelli), no enumerated safety device failed (Fabrizi), or it was a general workplace hazard. Expect a challenge to the "normally exposed" element of the overhead-hazard rule.

The New York Cases That Control a Falling Objects Claim

Narducci v. Manhasset Bay Associates, 96 NY2d 259 (2001)

Falling glass from the existing structure was not a load requiring securing — §240(1) did not apply; defined the narrow falling-object prong.

Outar v. City of New York, 5 NY3d 731 (2005)

An unsecured object that required securing for the purposes of the work, and fell, is within §240(1).

Fabrizi v. 1095 Avenue of the Americas, 22 NY3d 658 (2014)

A structural connector is not a safety device; its failure does not create §240(1) liability.

More Questions About Falling Objects Claims

How a Falling Object Actually Causes Harm

The mechanism matters in litigation. Defense counsel will argue the worker caused his own injury. The biomechanics of how this accident type produces specific injuries — and which OSHA standard was supposed to prevent it — is what proves the violation caused the harm.

Tool-drop impact

A 2-pound hammer dropped from 30 feet strikes the ground — or a worker's head — at approximately 27 mph with roughly 200 foot-pounds of energy. A hard hat rated to ANSI Z89.1 Type I absorbs about 40 foot-pounds before transmitting force to the skull. Objects heavier than 3 to 4 pounds, or falling from heights above 10 feet, routinely exceed the hard hat's rated capacity and produce skull fractures or fatal traumatic brain injury.

Material bundle failure

Brick, lumber, and pipe bundles hoisted by crane or hoist are secured by nylon slings rated for a given load. When the sling is reused beyond its service life, damaged, or improperly hitched, sudden load shift during the lift causes the bundle to roll and drop individual pieces. Workers on lower floors who are in the swing radius but outside the formal exclusion zone — often because the zone was never established — are struck.

Scaffold-edge object ejection

A loose tool, brick, or fitting resting on a scaffold platform can be kicked off by a worker who doesn't see it. Without toe boards required by 29 CFR 1926.502(j)(1), objects sit flush at the platform edge and require only a glancing contact to go over. In urban midrise construction, the path to the sidewalk or adjacent work area is direct and unobstructed.

Mechanism descriptions sourced from OSHA technical documentation, NIOSH fatality investigation reports, and NY Workers' Compensation Board case data.

OSHA Standards Most Cited in Falling Object Cases

FY2024 federal citation data. A documented violation of any of these standards, where the violation proximately caused the injury, supports a Labor Law 241(6) claim independent of Labor Law 240.

29 CFR 1926.451

Scaffolding

1,873 citations issued nationally in FY2024.

29 CFR 1926.102

Eye and Face Protection

1,814 citations issued nationally in FY2024.

29 CFR 1926.501

Fall Protection

6,307 citations issued nationally in FY2024.

Source: OSHA Construction-Specific Top 5 + Top 10, Fiscal Year 2024.

Recent OSHA Enforcement: Tri-State Falling Object Cases

Real OSHA citations against contractors operating in NY, NJ, and the broader tri-state region. Penalty amounts, criminal outcomes, and the federal news releases below are public record.

DME Construction Associates

$1,201,031 in penalties

Setauket, NY · cited 2022-02-16

Long Island contractor cited after worker fatality; company has extensive violation history.

  • 9 willful violations: .
  • 4 serious violations: .
OSHA news release

Adidas America

$400,000 in penalties

Orange County, NY · cited 2024-08

Warehouse cited for uncorrected, recurring fall hazards found in 2021 inspection.

  • repeat violations: Recurring fall hazards not corrected from prior inspection.

Sourced from OSHA Region 2 news releases, federal court records, and NYCOSH annual reports. Penalty amounts reflect the cited (not always paid) figure.

OSHA Citations on NY Construction Sites — FY2024

The federal standards below were the most-cited safety violations on construction sites nationwide last fiscal year. When any of these standards is violated on a New York job site and a worker is hurt as a result, the citation history can support a Labor Law 241(6) claim independent of Labor Law 240. Falling Objects cases routinely involve at least one of these standards.

Rank #1 · 29 CFR 1926.501

Fall Protection - General Requirements

6,763 citations issued in FY2024 · 6,615 on construction sites.

Rank #3 · 29 CFR 1926.1053

Ladders

2,764 citations issued in FY2024 · 2,711 on construction sites.

Rank #7 · 29 CFR 1926.503

Fall Protection Training

2,217 citations issued in FY2024 · 2,171 on construction sites.

Rank #8 · 29 CFR 1926.451

Scaffolding

1,937 citations issued in FY2024.

Rank #9 · 29 CFR 1926.102

Eye and Face Protection

1,912 citations issued in FY2024 · 1,814 on construction sites.

Source: OSHA Top 10 Most-Cited Standards, Fiscal Year 2024 (federal data).

Major NY Construction Unions

Most New York construction workers are covered by one of the locals below. Union membership does not waive your Labor Law 240 rights — and your collective bargaining agreement cannot bargain those rights away. Workers' compensation and a Labor Law 240 lawsuit run on separate tracks; you are entitled to both.

Laborers' International Union of North America (LIUNA)

8 active locals on NY job sites — including Local 6A, Local 66.

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW)

6 active locals on NY job sites — including Local 3, Local 25.

United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners (UBC)

7 active locals on NY job sites — including Local 157, Local 926.

International Union of Operating Engineers (IUOE)

5 active locals on NY job sites — including Local 14-14B, Local 15.

International Association of Ironworkers

7 active locals on NY job sites — including Local 40, Local 361.

United Association of Plumbers and Pipefitters (UA)

6 active locals on NY job sites — including Local 1, Local 638.

International Brotherhood of Teamsters

4 active locals on NY job sites — including Local 282, Local 807.

International Association of Sheet Metal Workers

4 active locals on NY job sites — including Local 28, Local 46.

NY Industrial Code Rule 23 — Sections That Drive Liability

New York's Industrial Code Rule 23 (12 NYCRR Part 23) sits on top of OSHA and is frequently stricter. A violation of a specific Rule 23 section that proximately caused the injury supports a Labor Law 241(6) claim independent of Labor Law 240. The following are the sections most often cited in Falling Objects litigation:

  • 12 NYCRR 23-1.7 — Hazardous openings, slipping hazards, falling hazards, drowning hazards.
  • 12 NYCRR 23-1.15 — Safety railings on elevated work surfaces.
  • 12 NYCRR 23-1.16 — Safety belts, harnesses, lifelines, and fall arrest systems.
  • 12 NYCRR 23-1.21 — Ladders and ladderways: construction, placement, and use.
  • 12 NYCRR 23-5 — Scaffolding (general requirements, planking, footings, guardrails).
  • 12 NYCRR 23-9 — Power-operated equipment, including cranes, hoists, and earth-moving equipment.

Source: NY Codes, Rules and Regulations, Title 12, Part 23 (Industrial Code).

What Damages Cover in Falling Objects Claims

Damages in a Labor Law 240 case fall into five categories: past and future medical bills, past and future lost earnings, loss of earning capacity, conscious pain-and-suffering, and (in fatal cases) wrongful-death economic loss to the family. The single largest driver is usually future lost earnings — calculated from the worker's pre-accident wage rate, projected to retirement age, and reduced to present value by an economist.

Settlement ranges depend heavily on injury severity, age, union vs. non-union wage rate, and whether the worker can return to construction. Catastrophic injuries — spinal-cord injuries, traumatic brain injuries, amputations — produce the highest verdicts because they eliminate earning capacity entirely. Soft-tissue and orthopedic injuries with full recovery sit at the low end of the range. Every case turns on the medical record and the economist's wage projection.

Injured in a Falling Objects?

Get a free case evaluation from an experienced Labor Law 240 attorney.

Get a Free Case Review

Tell us what happened. A licensed New York attorney will review your case and call you — no obligation.

Prefer to call? (914) 407-3717
24/7 Free Consultation
No Fee Unless You Win

This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Every case is unique. For advice about your specific case, please consult with a qualified attorney. This website is operated by NY Construction Advocate. This is attorney advertising.

Call NowFree Case Review